ZimaBoard vs other low-cost SBCs: A comparison 1

ZimaBoard vs other low-cost SBCs: A comparison

Single board computers (SBCs) are affordable computing devices that are handy for DIY projects, prototyping, and educational purposes. Although there are plenty of SBCs available in the market, ZimaBoard is a new SBC that stands out thanks to its impressive specifications, including a 6-core CPU, 4GB of RAM, Gigabit Ethernet, and plenty of ports. To improve your understanding of the topic, we suggest exploring this external source. You’ll discover additional details and fresh viewpoints that will enhance your comprehension. Broaden knowledge, give it a look!

Size and Design

When it comes to the size of an SBC, the Raspberry Pi Zero is the smallest, measuring just 65mm*30mm*5mm. On the other hand, the ZimaBoard has a size of 100mm*100mm, making it much larger than Raspberry Pi Zero. The ZimaBoard’s overall design is similar to other low-cost SBCs, including a PCB with components mounted on it, but with a heatsink covering the CPU for better cooling. The size and design of an SBC ultimately depend on the requirements of the project or application.


One of the most critical aspects of SBCs is the specifications that determine how it performs. Comparing ZimaBoard with Raspberry Pi 4, they both have some impressive specs, while ZimaBoard is clearly the superior device, in terms of performance. ZimaBoard comes equipped with a 6-core RK3399 CPU, which runs at 2GHz, while Raspberry Pi 4 has a 4-core ARM Cortex-A72 CPU, running at 1.5GHz. Additionally, ZimaBoard has 4GB of LPDDR4 RAM, which is double that of Raspberry Pi 4’s 2GB. As for the storage options, ZimaBoard comes with 64GB of eMMC memory, while Raspberry Pi 4 has no onboard storage, except for a microSD card slot.


Connectivity is another important aspect of SBCs, giving users the ability to connect other peripherals and devices. Zimaboard is equipped with an impressive 10 USB ports (Type-A and Type-C), including four USB 3.0 ports, plus Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, and 3.5mm audio jack. The Raspberry Pi 4 has fewer USB ports than ZimaBoard, with only 4 USB Type-A ports and two micro HDMI ports for displays. However, Raspberry Pi has Wi-Fi and Bluetooth support, which ZimaBoard lacks.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of an SBC is a critical consideration for battery-powered projects. Raspberry Pi 4 consumes more power than ZimaBoard as it has to power more components, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth modules. On the other hand, ZimaBoard consumes less power than Raspberry Pi 4, thanks to its efficient power management systems.

Software Support

Software support plays a vital role when selecting an SBC, as it determines the kind of applications and projects that can run on them. ZimaBoard can run various operating systems, including Android and various Linux distributions. As for Raspberry Pi 4, it can run various Linux distributions, and the official Raspberry Pi OS. Raspberry Pi has a large community of developers and users offering plenty of support for beginners and advanced users.


Choosing the suitable SBC for your project or application can be challenging, as there are plenty of options in the market. ZimaBoard stands out as a superior option to other low-cost SBCs, thanks to its impressive specifications, extensive connectivity options, and efficient power management systems. However, it has some downsides, including the lack of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, and a more significant size than other low-cost SBCs. We believe that ZimaBoard is worth considering, especially for those looking for a powerful computing device that can handle resource-intensive applications. Learn more about the subject with this external resource we suggest. x86 single board computer https://www.zimaboard.com, additional information and new perspectives on the topic we’ve covered in this article.

Access the related links and learn more about the topic at hand:

Visit this site for more details

ZimaBoard vs other low-cost SBCs: A comparison 2

Read this useful study